Wed, Jan
88 New Articles

Czech Real Estate Transfer Tax After the Latest Changes: Catching Up with Regional Trends?

Czech Real Estate Transfer Tax After the Latest Changes: Catching Up with Regional Trends?

Czech Republic
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

This past autumn brought extensive changes to the Czech Republic’s real estate acquisition tax, which, according to lawmakers, should align the country’s regulation to the European standard. Is it really the case? With the assistance of members of the Real Estate team within Taylor Wessing CEE, we compare the new regulation to those in neighboring countries. 

Before the amendment, the seller of real estate was generally obliged to pay the transfer tax, although the parties could agree that the buyer would take over that role. In practice, the ability to choose the actual taxpayer created a number of problems. The Amendment removes the option to choose the taxpayer, and now in all cases the taxpayer will be the buyer.

With regard to other Central European countries, it cannot be said unequivocally whether the change made by the Czech Republic is in line with a regional trend. Regulations in neighboring countries vary, and we find representations of virtually all possible solutions. In Poland, the taxpayer is the seller. In Hungary, it is the buyer, and it is also possible to assume the tax obligation under civil law, although the exchange requires the approval of the tax authority and is not binding. In Austria, both parties are jointly and severally liable, and their arrangements for paying the tax (as is in practice the rule) is not binding for the tax administrator. Slovakia went so far as to abolish the tax altogether in 2004. 

The amendment also removes the statutory liability of the buyer in the Czech Republic for payment of the tax by the seller. For the buyer, his position as guarantor was, of course, unfortunate, and therefore in practice as a rule he generally tried to “secure” the payment of the tax by the seller, mostly by retaining a part of the purchase price corresponding to the amount of the tax until proof of payment of the tax was made.

In other Central European jurisdictions, no such statutory liability exists. In Austria, however, as noted earlier, by law both parties are taxpayers, thus the situation is similar to the earlier Czech statutory liability: if the party obliged to pay the tax under the contract does not do so, the tax administrator usually turns to the other party to do so.

The 4% tax rate – above the regional average – was left untouched by the amendment. The only neighboring country with a higher tax is Hungary, where, in addition to the basic rate of 4%, an additional rate of 2% is applied if the tax base exceeds a certain threshold. Indeed, in most nearby countries, the tax is lower.

From time to time, the issue of taxation of so-called share deals (in companies owning real estate) comes up for discussion. Through share deals, it is possible in the Czech Republic to legally avoid the transfer tax. The amendment has gone so far as to eliminate the exemption of real estate’s contribution to the capital of companies, although subsequent dispositions in the form of a share deal remained exempt from the tax.

In neighboring states it is common to tax share deals. For example, in Hungary over the past ten years there has been a trend towards reducing the tax burden in relation to immovables, but share deals involving a minimum 75% share remain subject to the transfer tax. A similar rule applies in Austria (only it must be a 100% share). So if the Czech Ministry of Finance wanted to extend the tax on share deals in the future, practice in the neighboring states could serve as argument.

This recent amendment to the Czech real estate acquisition tax, in our opinion, has increased legal certainty. Whether it follows regional trends cannot however be unequivocally confirmed. Especially with regard to the rate of taxation, the country is definitely “behind.” The question is whether the best way forward would be to help shift the regional trend towards the simplest possible solution and follow Slovakia’s lead: To simply cancel the transfer tax.

By Marketa Cvrckova, Partner, Taylor Wessing

This Article was originally published in Issue 4.5 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

Czech Republic Knowledge Partner

HAVEL & PARTNERS, attorneys-at-law, with offices in Prague, Brno, Bratislava, Pilsen, Olomouc, and Ostrava, has a team of 220 lawyers, tax advisors and 500 employees in total, is the largest independent law firm in Central Europe.

Our clients include large international companies, leading Czech and Slovak firms, including strategic state-owned companies and public sector authorities, as well as medium-size businesses, individual entrepreneurs, and investors. We advise approximately 100 of the Fortune 500 companies, and almost 50 of the Czech Top 100 companies. HAVEL & PARTNERS currently provides its services to a total of 2,000 clients. We have the most comprehensive international support available to both Czech and Slovak law firms. We provide legal and tax advice in 12 world languages in more than 90 countries around the globe. Up to 70 % of the transactions we deal with involve an international aspect.

HAVEL & PARTNERS was named the best law firm operating in the Czech Republic by the prestigious British rating agencies Chambers and Partners (2020) and Who’s Who Legal (2018, 2019). It is also the most successful law firm, providing the most comprehensive legal services in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, based on the total number of all nominations and awards in all years of the Law Firm of the Year awards. The firm became the absolute winner of this competition four times in the last six years, receiving the main award Domestic Law Firm of the Year in the Czech Republic (2015, 2017, 2018, 2020) and ranking as one of the most recommended law firms in all categories of law. Our company is also a three-time winner of the Law Firm of the Year award for Best Client Services (2015, 2016, 2019). In the field of M&A, HAVEL & PARTNERS is the best law firm in the Czech Republic based on the annual International Advisory Experts awards (2018, 2019). In Slovakia, it also won the prestigious global M&A Today Awards (2013–2018) for Mergers & Acquisitions six times in a row, and repeatedly won first place in the ranking by Lawyer International Legal 100 (2017, 2018). Prestigious international rating agencies EMIS DealWatch and Mergermarket have ranked HAVEL & PARTNERS among the leading law firms by the number of transactions completed in the entire CEE region since 2009. Based on annual awards of the Acquisition International magazine, HAVEL & PARTNERS has become the Law Firm of the Year 2019 in the M&A category in the CEE region.

Firm's website: https://www.havelpartners.cz/en/

Our Latest Issue