24
Fri, Sep
43 New Articles

Clinical Trials as of 31 January 2022 under New “EU” Regime

Clinical Trials as of 31 January 2022 under New “EU” Regime

Czech Republic
Tools
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

On 31 January 2022, the “new” Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC (the “Regulation“) will enter into force. After several delays (the launch was originally planned for 2015), the European Medicines Agency (the “EMA”) has confirmed to the Commission that the EU portal and the EU database, which were a prerequisite for the launch, are now fully functioning. At the same time, the EMA confirmed that the EU portal and database will be put into operation on 31 January 2022. As of this date, the Regulation will become fully applicable in all EU Member States.

EU PORTAL AND PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE EU DATABASE

The EU portal will serve as a single “entry” (communication) point for the submission of data relating to clinical trials. Henceforth, applications for clinical trials will be submitted through this portal only (and not to all local administrative bodies) and will be assessed through this portal. All data will be stored in a publicly accessible EU database (that is to avoid unnecessary duplication with the EudraCT and Eudravigilance databases, as expressly stated in the Regulation).

Besides applications for the authorisation of a clinical trial, sponsors will also submit through the EU portal, for example, notifications of the start, temporary halt or termination of a clinical trial in each Member State, as well as a summary of the results and a clinical study report.

Although it will be a public database, some data will be excluded from publication. For example, the personal data of data subjects or confidential information of a commercial nature, in particular with regard to the status of marketing authorisation of a medicinal product, “unless there is an overriding public interest in disclosure”.

It will be interesting to see how the concept of public interest evolves, as, particularly in the current pandemic era, COVID 19 medicinal products and vaccines are very often discussed in the media even before they are authorised. Other exemptions from disclosure will include, for example, confidential communications between Member States in connection with the preparation of an assessment report and data needed for effective supervision over clinical trials across the EU.

UNIFORM RULES FOR CLINICAL TRIALS

The Regulation aims to ensure uniform rules for conducting clinical trials across the EU. To this end, it introduces in particular an authorisation procedure based on a single submission via the EU portal and an evaluation procedure leading to a single decision. The submitted application will be assessed by all Member States concerned for their own territory in the light of specified aspects, providing that the decisive conclusion on the acceptability of the clinical trial will be made by the reporting Member State. The Member States concerned may disagree with this conclusion only on the grounds listed in the Regulation.

The Regulation is also intended to harmonise rules for the protection of subjects, including requirements for informed consent. In this context, the Member States are free to decide regarding the signatures of an incapacitated person and a minor who is capable of forming an opinion and assessing the information obtained.

The Czech legislature took advantage of the possibility for minors and, by an amendment to Act No. 378/2007 Sb., on Pharmaceuticals and on Amendments to Certain Related Acts (the “Act on Pharmaceuticals”), it included a requirement for the consent of a minor where it is appropriate to his or her intellectual and volitional maturity. In the Czech Republic, persons with limited legal capacity as well as other groups of persons in a “subordinate or dependent position” may only be subjects of trials under stricter and exceptional conditions (set out beyond the scope of the Regulation).

The harmonisation will also affect safety reporting. The Eudravigilance database operated by the EMA is now expected to allow for joint reporting when more than one investigational medicinal product is involved in a clinical trial. Only in the case of serious unexpected adverse reactions will the Czech Act on Pharmaceuticals allow the Czech State Institute for Drug Control (the “SIDC”) and the sponsor to enter into an agreement, subject to the requirements set out in the Regulation, under which the sponsor will report suspected serious unexpected adverse reactions directly to the SIDC (that will further report them to the EMA). It is open to consideration whether or not the conclusion of the agreement (leading to dual reporting) will be a practical benefit for sponsors that they will use after the Regulation comes into force.

Jointly with the Regulation, the Commission Regulation on good manufacturing practice for investigational medicinal products for human use, including detailed Commission guidance on the same, will also enter into force.

ARCHIVING PERIOD FINALLY UNIFIED?

As for archiving periods, a clinical trial master file should, under the Regulation, be retained for 25 years after the end of the clinical trial, on media ensuring the completeness and legibility of the content throughout that period, so that it can be made available to the competent authorities upon request. This is expected to harmonise the fragmented implementation of the periods in the Member States.

For the Czech Republic, it should also remove the uncertain situation where, in 2017, in anticipation of the Regulation coming into force, the Czech legislature deleted certain provisions from the Act on Pharmaceuticals to avoid conflicts with the Regulation (which, however, is only now coming into force).

As a result, for the Czech Republic, the current Czech regulations used only the minimum 15-year period for the retention of identification codes, and the sponsors have already now resolved the often difficult issue of archiving periods for those 25 years applicable to all Member States in which the clinical trial took place. It should be added that the retention periods for pharmacovigilance and medical records are not subject to this harmonisation.

APPLICABILITY OF THE REGULATION AND TRANSITIONAL PERIOD

The Regulation will only apply within the EU. However, its principles regarding the rights and protection of subjects and the robustness of the data generated in the trial should also be complied with for those clinical trials conducted outside of the EU and are to be the basis on which an EU marketing authorisation application is to be filed.

Current clinical trials will be subject to a transitional regime. The Regulation provides that if an application for authorisation of a clinical trial was submitted before the effective date of the Regulation under Directive 2001/20/EC (the “Directive”), such clinical trial will continue to be governed by the Directive until three years after the effective date of the Regulation, i.e. until 31 January 2025.

If the application is submitted between the sixth and eighteenth month after the publication of the notice on the functionality of the EU portal in the Official Journal of the European Union, the clinical trial (of the sponsor’s voluntary choice) may be started in accordance with the Directive and will be governed by the Directive for 42 months from the date of the notice. Thereafter, clinical trials are to be fully subject to the regime of the Regulation.

By Vaclav Audes, Partner, and Katerina Slavikova, Associate, Havel & Partners

Czech Republic Knowledge Partner

HAVEL & PARTNERS, attorneys-at-law, with offices in Prague, Brno, Bratislava, Pilsen, Olomouc, and Ostrava, has a team of 250 lawyers, tax advisors and 500 employees in total, is the largest independent law firm in Central Europe.

Our clients include large international companies, leading Czech and Slovak firms, including strategic state-owned companies and public sector authorities, as well as medium-size businesses, individual entrepreneurs, and investors. We advise approximately  150 of the Fortune 500 companies, almost 50 of the Czech Top 100 companies and 20 of the TOP 100 Slovak companies. HAVEL & PARTNERS currently provides its services to a total of 2,500 clients. We have the most comprehensive international support available to both Czech and Slovak law firms. We provide legal and tax advice in 12 languages in more than 110 countries around the globe. Up to 70 % of the transactions we deal with involve an international aspect.

HAVEL & PARTNERS was named the best law firm operating in the Czech Republic by the prestigious global rating agencies Chambers and Partners (2020, 2021) and Who’s Who Legal (2018, 2019). It is also the most successful law firm, providing the most comprehensive legal services in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, based on the total number of all nominations and awards in all years of the Law Firm of the Year awards. The firm became the absolute winner of this competition four times in the last six years, receiving the main award Domestic Law Firm of the Year in the Czech Republic (2015, 2017, 2018, 2020) and ranking as one of the most recommended law firms in all categories of law. Our company is also a four -time winner of the Law Firm of the Year award for Best Client Services (2015, 2016, 2019, 2020). In the field of M&A, HAVEL & PARTNERS is the best law firm in the Czech Republic based on the annual International Advisory Experts awards (2018, 2019). Prestigious international rating agencies EMIS DealWatch and Mergermarket have ranked HAVEL & PARTNERS among the leading law firms by the number of transactions completed in the Czech Republic since 2010. Based on annual awards of the Acquisition International magazine, HAVEL & PARTNERS has become the Law Firm of the Year 2019 in the M&A category in the CEE region.

Firm's website: https://www.havelpartners.cz/en/

Our Latest Issue