Tue, Aug
81 New Articles

Significant Ruling by Turkish Constitutional Court on Unquantified Debt Lawsuits

Significant Ruling by Turkish Constitutional Court on Unquantified Debt Lawsuits

  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Turkish Constitutional Court with its decision with application number 2019/12190, published in the Official Gazette on 20.04.2022, ruled that court decisions on dismissal of unquantified debt lawsuits on procedural grounds violates right to access to court.

Background of Legal Dispute

In Turkish procedural law, pursuant to Article 107 of the Code of Civil Procedure No. 6100, unquantified debt lawsuits can only be filed in cases where the plaintiff cannot be expected to determine the debt amount, or where the debt amount is not determinable at all. If the plaintiff files an unquantified debt lawsuit for a determinable debt, the courts reject the case on the grounds that the plaintiff has no legal interest in filing this lawsuit [for instance, HGK. E. 2016/482 K. 2018/1047 T. 9.5.2018; HGK. E. 2015/2551 K. 2018/1022 T. 9.5.2018].

In the dispute at hand, the plaintiff, who is a municipality worker, filed a lawsuit for unquantified debt against the municipality before court of first instance for the short payment of wages and bonuses arising from the collective labour agreement. Court of first instance accepted the case, and the decision was appealed. In appellate level, the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation stated that remaining receivables can be calculated as per the collective labour agreement, therefore, the subject of the lawsuit is indeed determinable, and these claims cannot be subject of an unquantified debt lawsuit. Then, the court of first instance complied with the reasoning of the Court of Cassation and dismissed the case on procedural grounds, and thereafter, the Court of Cassation affirmed the decision. In response, the plaintiff filed individual application before the Constitutional Court.

Summary of Constitutional Court’s Decision

Firstly, the Constitutional Court noted that it was not its responsibility to dispute whether the Court of Cassation’s ruling was correct from civil procedural law perspective, and rather it would only assess whether the right of access to a court had been violated.

Subsequently, dismissal on procedural grounds’ decision would be regarded a suitable instrument if a lawsuit had been initiated through an incorrect procedure, to achieve the most effective litigation. According to the Constitutional Court, however, issuing a decision regarding dismissal on procedural grounds is not a tool that affects the applicant’s rights at a minimum level, but rather a heavy intervention. The Constitutional Court emphasized at this point that the judge is vested with broad powers and accordingly, has the right to clarify ambiguous issues.

As a result, the Constitutional Court ruled that dismissal on procedural grounds’ decision is not the last resort for a lawsuit filed through an incorrect procedure, and that choosing a method that makes access to the court impossible rather than opting for a less intrusive intervention tool violates the right to access the court.

It will be a matter of curiosity whether the tool of unquantified debt lawsuit will be abused following the Constitutional Court’s judgment.

By Baris Ulker, Senior Associate, and M.R. Cafer Koc, Legal Intern, Guleryuz & Partners

Guleryuz & Partners at a Glance

Güleryüz & Partners Attorneys at Law is an Istanbul based law firm offering a broad scope of high-quality legal services to domestic and multinational clients across a wide range of regulated and non-regulated industries. The Firm is comprised of energetic young professionals, led by experienced lawyers with a proven track record of working in the most demanding environments possible. Our team has comprehensive experience in serving clients in connection with a full breadth of Turkish law matters including Litigation & Dispute Resolution, M&A, Wealth Management & Family Businesses, General Corporate & Contract Law, Real Estate & Construction, Enforcement and Bankruptcy Proceedings, Labor Law, Administrative Law, and Anti-Corruption & White-Collar Crimes. 

Our core business culture is centered on integrity, dedication to clients’ needs, and excellence of legal advice and services. Therefore, our primary objective is to ensure the most personalized and reliable legal service for our clients. In pursuit of this objective, the international academic backgrounds of our partners at prestigious universities in USA, UK and Germany coupled with more than ten years of past experience at top tier Turkish law firms enhances the visionary practice of the Firm.

We blend our practical expertise with our outstanding grasp of legal theory in order to provide our clients with legal services of unmatched quality. Our clients range from multinational companies where we provide a level of attention normally only expected from in-house counsels in order to timely manage every aspect of the clients’ legal needs, to individuals for whom we make their objectives ours in order to provide comfort and ease of life. While we always put client service above all, we are proud to be on a quest to make reliable legal information available for everyone. Hence, we are constantly authoring articles on a broad scope of legal topics for respectable publications including Bloomberg Businessweek and the monthly magazine TR Monitor.

While Güleryüz & Partners operates mainly in Turkish and English, we are capable of providing legal services in French, German and Russian as well. The Firm also has an associated office in Ankara.

You can learn more about the Firm at guleryuz.av.tr