Sun, Aug
57 New Articles

The Impact of Facial Recognition Systems on Democracy

The Impact of Facial Recognition Systems on Democracy

  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Facial recognition system is considered an artificial intelligence solution empowered by a camera system, which can identify persons viewed based on image data stored in a related data base. Such systems have already been implemented around the globe in many countries and generally faced severe criticism, especially in Western democracies. Naturally, facial recognition systems have the capability of helping to prevent terrorist attacks and similar severe crimes an detect suspects and other persons of interest. In practice, however, such systems often provide inaccurate or biased results.

With regard to the above, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on 6 October 2021, banning the public use of facial recognition systems for law enforcement purposes. Similarly, the European Data Protection Board and the European Data Protection Supervisor adopted a joint opinion on 21 June 2021 calling for ban on AI for automated recognition in public spaces.

The Draft EU AI Regulation also generally prohibits the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems for the purpose of law enforcement with certain exceptions (including the targeted search for specific potential victims of crime, the prevention of terrorist attacks or similar threats, detection, localization, identification or prosecution of perpetrators of certain serious crimes). It is highlighted, however, that currently such systems do not certainly seem capable of serving law enforcement purposes effectively especially due to the risks associated with algorithmic bias, effects on democracy and non-compliance with data protection requirements.

The data protection authority and court practice in Europe also have such fears about facial recognition systems and their effects on democratic societies. The Italian data protection authority, for example, imposed a data protection fine of EUR 20 million on Clearview AI, a US company offering facial recognition solutions. A number of data protection authorities and courts in Europe also imposed a ban or a similar fine on facial recognition systems implemented in schools. The Hungarian data protection authority also reviewed the CCTV operation of a local municipality in Hungary, which was allegedly empowered by facial recognition capabilities, however, it turned out that such function of the system was not activated.

In line with the above, facial recognition systems currently do not seem to be capable of serving law enforcement purposes without serious risks of bias, opacity and non-compliance with privacy and data protection laws.

By Daniel Necz, Senior Associate, DLA Piper

DLA Piper at a Glance

DLA Piper is a global law firm with lawyers located in more than 40 countries throughout the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, helping clients with their legal needs around the world. We strive to be the leading global full-service law firm by delivering quality and value to our clients. With practical and innovative legal solutions, we help our clients succeed.

In Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), DLA Piper continues to grow and now employs more than 320 lawyers, including 46 partners across its six offices in Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. With our global set-up and established relationship firms across all other CEE jurisdictions, we are among the largest and most experienced international law firms in the region. Through our experience gained advising on a variety of high-profile projects and the long-term relationships we have established with our clients, we have built a reputation as a leading business law firm across CEE.

Firm's website.