The Amendment of the Austrian Copyright Act fundamentally revised the Copyright contract law. An entire series of new provisions for the protection of authors was implemented. But what does this mean for (future) license holders? Let us take a look!
E+H Announces New Managing Partners and Management Board
E+H has announced a new management board, consisting of Partners Peter Winkler, Dieter Thalhammer, Alric Ofenheimer, Marco Steiner, and Jana Eichmeyer, with Thalhammer and Ofenheimer taking over operational management and serving as Managing Partners.
Olga Sipka Joins Kinstellar as Head of Competition and Compliance
Former Schoenherr Of Counsel Olga Sipka has joined Kinstellar as a Special Counsel and new Head of the local Competition and Compliance practice in Belgrade.
TGS Baltic Successful for KredEx before Estonia’s Supreme Court on Extraordinary Loans
TGS Baltic has successfully represented KredEx before Estonia’s Supreme Court in a dispute regarding COVID-19 pandemic-related extraordinary loans.
Integrites Successful for Epiroc in Safeguard Investigation
Integrites has successfully represented Epiroc in a safeguard investigation in Ukraine regarding the company's imports of three-cone drill bits into the country.
EU General Court Largely Upholds Google's Record Android Penalty
In its decision dated 18.08.2018 and numbered AT.40099, the European Union Commission [the "EU Commission"] fined Google with 4.34 billion Euros for abusing its dominant position through requiring smartphone makers to take a bundle of Google apps, preventing use of other versions of Android and concluding anti-competitive revenue share agreements. The General Court [the “Court”] dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the Commission’s decision by slightly reducing the amount of fine to 4.125 billion EUR. This was recorded as the highest penalty ever imposed by European competition authorities.
Is the Turkish Competition Board Starting to Scrutinize Ancillary Restraints More Rigorously? - Vinmar/Arısan Transaction is Approved on the Condition that Scope of Non-Compete and Non-Solicit Obligations is Limited
This article aims to provide information regarding the ancillary restraints under Turkish Merger Control Regime and also analyses the Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) Vinmar/Arısan decision which provides insight into the Board’s approach to assessing the scope of ancillary restraints in merger cases and foreshadows potentially stricter scrutiny over such restrictions.